The war machine’s propaganda outlets try to brainwash us into believing that attacking Iraq somehow made the world a better, safer place. The latest justification for why we attacked Iraq (after all the previous excuses for why Bush decided to attack oil-rich Iraq turned out to be lies) is the claim that we’re waging a war against terror (as if waging war wasn’t an act of terror itself) to end terrorism.
So, how’s that working out? Not so well, apparently. According to a State Department report, terrorism is up 30%.
A State Department report on terrorism due out next week will show a nearly 30 percent increase in terrorist attacks worldwide in 2006 to more than 14,000, almost all of the boost due to growing violence in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. officials said Friday.
So, let me get this straight… We supposedly attacked Iraq to fight terrorism, and yet terrorism has gone up by one third. I’m not a mathematician, but to me that sounds like we’re achieving the opposite effect of the stated objective. Or in other words, we’re losing.
And Harry Reid had the nerve to point out the obvious. How DARE he? Recently he made the comment that the Iraq war is lost, and the right-wing propaganda outlets were all over him, trying to demonize him for being honest.
Apparently right-wing pundits hate honesty as much as “they” supposedly hate freedom. Whoever “they” happen to be on any given day. The Sunnis, the Shiites, Iraqis, Iranians, Arabs, Muslims, Persians, the UN, Canadians, Mexicans, Europeans… take your pick. According to right-wing hate mongers, “they” all hate us for our freedom.