Comments on: Losing The So-Called War On Terror http://www.newsnation.net/2007/04/28/losing-the-so-called-war-on-terror/ Your Online News Source Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:29:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 By: czech mate http://www.newsnation.net/2007/04/28/losing-the-so-called-war-on-terror/#comment-15 czech mate Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:25:09 +0000 http://www.newsnation.net/2007/04/28/losing-the-so-called-war-on-terror/#comment-15 To call it a "War on Terror" was the wrong label in the first place. It implies that you are fighting an organised, monolithic agency that has a central base, instead of the diametrically opposed groups who can't even agree on the colour of shit, that they actually are. Bush's "War on Terror" has succeeded - in giving these erstwhile fragmented groups a common goal, which means these former enemies are now becoming allies, albeit on a fragile basis. Harry Reid, plus a few retired Generals, are now venting their ire on what is argueably the worst administration ever to to elected by a democratic society at the expense of the democracy they fought so long and hard to attain. In all European history this has happened once (Adolf Hitler) and the European Union is continuing to put up safeguards to prevent this from ever happening again. One safeguard is a rotating Presidency - the Prime Minister of each member state becomes EU president for a maximum of 6 months - the EU now comprises of 27 member states + 9 candidates. A President/Monarch in Europe is only a FIGUREHEAD whose only real function is to rubber-stamp legislation, is NOT allowed to veto, but is allowed to put forward a counterpoint for further discussion on any issue he/she disagrees with. As Winston Spencer Chuchill once said " Propaganda only works while you're winning", which is what the current administrationmis having to come to terms with now. To call it a “War on Terror” was the wrong label in the first place. It implies that you are fighting an organised, monolithic agency that has a central base, instead of the diametrically opposed groups who can’t even agree on the colour of shit, that they actually are.
Bush’s “War on Terror” has succeeded - in giving these erstwhile fragmented groups a common goal, which means these former enemies are now becoming allies, albeit on a fragile basis.
Harry Reid, plus a few retired Generals, are now venting their ire on what is argueably the worst administration ever to to elected by a democratic society at the expense of the democracy they fought so long and hard to attain.
In all European history this has happened once (Adolf Hitler) and the European Union is continuing to put up safeguards to prevent this from ever happening again.
One safeguard is a rotating Presidency - the Prime Minister of each member state becomes EU president for a maximum of 6 months - the EU now comprises of 27 member states + 9 candidates.
A President/Monarch in Europe is only a FIGUREHEAD whose only real function is to rubber-stamp legislation, is NOT allowed to veto, but is allowed to put forward a counterpoint for further discussion on any issue he/she disagrees with.
As Winston Spencer Chuchill once said ” Propaganda only works while you’re winning”, which is what the current administrationmis having to come to terms with now.

]]> By: Dave Muckey http://www.newsnation.net/2007/04/28/losing-the-so-called-war-on-terror/#comment-21 Dave Muckey Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:17:19 +0000 http://www.newsnation.net/2007/04/28/losing-the-so-called-war-on-terror/#comment-21 <img src="http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/uc/20070426/spo070425.gif" alt="sin palabras" /> sin palabras

]]> By: Oil Wars and US Support for Terrorism in Iran » News Nation http://www.newsnation.net/2007/04/28/losing-the-so-called-war-on-terror/#comment-34 Oil Wars and US Support for Terrorism in Iran » News Nation Wed, 02 May 2007 16:31:27 +0000 http://www.newsnation.net/2007/04/28/losing-the-so-called-war-on-terror/#comment-34 [...] mentioned previously, the latest State Department statistics show that terrorism has gone up by 30% last year. So the “War on Terror” is an  abject failure (something the republicans will never [...] […] mentioned previously, the latest State Department statistics show that terrorism has gone up by 30% last year. So the “War on Terror” is an  abject failure (something the republicans will never […]

]]> By: Valtrex. http://www.newsnation.net/2007/04/28/losing-the-so-called-war-on-terror/#comment-21892 Valtrex. Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:10:42 +0000 http://www.newsnation.net/2007/04/28/losing-the-so-called-war-on-terror/#comment-21892 <strong>Valtrex....</strong> Valtrex and weight loss. Valtrex. Valtrex door delievery.... Valtrex….

Valtrex and weight loss. Valtrex. Valtrex door delievery….

]]>